Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/04/16/10:05:25
On Wednesday, April 15, 1998 4:06 AM, Michael Lemke, Sternwarte Bamberg, Phone:
+49-951-9522216 [SMTP:ai26 AT sternwarte DOT uni-erlangen DOT de] wrote:
> # From Date Subject
>
> 56 SMTP%"dan AT ttinet DOT com 15-APR-1998 Re: [cygwin] Terminal Emulator for
> Win
> 57 SMTP%"shoppa AT alph02. 15-APR-1998 Re: [cygwin] Help, DLT way too slow
>
> 58 SMTP%"helbig AT man DOT ac. 15-APR-1998 Re: [cygwin] UCX SMTP question
>
> 59 SMTP%"VAXman AT TMESIS. 15-APR-1998 Re: [cygwin] Date simulation on VAX
> an
> 60 SMTP%"ajcg AT hotmail DOT c 15-APR-1998 $$$ Earn money being honest and smart
>
> 61 SMTP%"pvhp AT forte DOT com 15-APR-1998 Re: [cygwin] several failed builds on
>
> 62 SMTP%"jmaynard AT phoen 15-APR-1998 Unix geek with a VAX
>
> 63 SMTP%"ARMISTEJ AT oeca. 15-APR-1998 RE: [CYGWIN] So...without a manual,
> ho
> 64 SMTP%"ARMISTEJ AT oeca. 15-APR-1998 RE: [CYGWIN] User written system
> servi
[deleted]
> See how all the subject lines are cut at the end?
This is a problem with your mail reader program, not the mailing list
software. You get the same problem if the subject line was 8 characters
longer. Also, the mailing list software prepends the [cygwin]. Thus,
it should always be the same. I don't see how one message could use
CAPS and another doesn't.
> >Why is it bad to 'bung up' the subject line? What's so special about a
> >subject line that you shouldn't 'bung it up'?
> The display should never exceed 80 chars. That's why you don't put your
> message in the subject field ;-)
Then why are you doing it? All of the above subject lines seem to be
complete sentences. This is the problem you are experiencing, not the
'bunging'.
--jc
P.S. Why do people keep insisting on CC'ing me? I am on the list.
Anything sent to the list will reach me eventually. Is there a point
in CC'ing me?
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -