Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/04/06/18:23:30
Is it possible to get cygwin32 to respond to
division by zero with SIGFPE?
I ported Yorick 1.4, ran the self test and got the
following error message:
"**WARNING** 1.0/0.0 does not trigger SIGFPE"
In fact, division by zero yields "Inf".
For Yorick to run reliably, division by zero
*must* yield SIGFPE.
Quite a few systems fail to produce SIGFPE, and
the Yorick distribution comes with a patch for
most of them. Unfortunately cygwin32 is not included.
Now I searched the cygwin32 tree for "divide by zero"
and found in +++/i386-cygwin32/include/ieeefp.h:
[...]
/* EXCEPTIONS */
typedef int fp_except;
#define FP_X_INV 0x10 /* Invalid operation */
#define FP_X_DX 0x80 /* Divide by zero */
#define FP_X_OFL 0x04 /* Overflow exception */
#define FP_X_UFL 0x02 /* Underflow exception */
#define FP_X_IMP 0x01 /* imprecise exception */
[...]
Yorick has a patch for Solaris which reads:
#include < ieeefp.h >
fpsetmask(FP_X_INV | FP_X_DZ | FP_X_OFL);
However, cygwin32 does not seem to include the
fpsetmask function. (And what about the difference
between FP_X_DX and FP_X_DZ? Is this a typo?)
I contacted David Munro (munro AT icf DOT llnl DOT gov), author
of Yorick. He was interested in the cygwin32 port,
but unaware of a way to get cygwin32 to produce
SIGFPE. However, he did send me a program to test
for proper divide by zero handling. It is attached
to this mail. I can't get it to produce SIGFPE.
Perhaps someone better versed in C than I could give
it a shot.
Thanks and best wishes,
Tijs
m DOT h DOT m DOT michels AT kub DOT nl
Ps: Apart from this, Yorick works great!
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -