Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/03/17/06:08:17
Dear James,
> I've used the the full environment (cdk.exe) vb18 as a viable shell
> solution for win95 for a bit now, and I'm quite impressed with the work
> you all have done.
>
> I'd like to move up (as painlessly as possible) to b19 with the X11R6.3
> binaries and clients. If possible, I'd like to substitute an X Environment
> for the win95 GUI.
>
I am not sure if it makes sense to entirely substitute one environment by
the other. Since X and win95 GUI can co-exist I find myself using both. As a
rule of thumb, if you have a native port of an application and an X port, more
often than not the native port is faster and more robust. Beware, that X
clients generally run more reliably on winNT than on win95. One typical
problem that I have experienced is the win95 (but not winNT) miss/delay of
some X events. Running nedit or ImageMagick on win95 can be quite frustating
at times. (This miss/delay of events is not exclusive of GNU Win32; X
aplications built with the CodeWarier kit have the sample problem).
> Any suggestions or tips for a smooth transition from a text-oriented b18
> installation to b19 and X?
Get yourself a reliable X server. Starnet's x-win32 is adequate; MI/X has
too many limitations, mainly the fact that it does not fully support the
Athena widgets. I personally use eXceed, but it is somewhat pricy. Follow
links on my page
http://dao.gsfc.nasa.gov/software/grads/win32/X11R6.3
for other available X servers.
Cheers!
--
Arlindo da Silva
dasilva AT alum DOT mit DOT edu
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -