Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/03/06/01:41:17
Geoffrey Noer said:
> > All of the usual timers (REAL, VIRTUAL, PROF), or just ITIMER_REAL?
>
> Just ITEMER_REAL. :-(
>
Bummer. I have a nagging suspicion I'm missing something in the NT
performance measurement interfaces, but they're (a) so ugly, and (b) so
numerous, that I can't figure it out. And that wouldn't help you, anyway,
since many of those don't exist under Win95.
> On a related subject, do you have a profiler working by any chance?
> (One based on ITIMER_REAL is better than none at all but...)
>
Not yet. After gcc and gdb, our next priority is g77.
(By the way, the source for our NT/Alpha gcc implementation is available on
our web site, http://www.opennt.com. It's based on 2.7.2., though, and I
couldn't say when we'd be able to roll up to 2.8.1. Some enterprising person
is more than welcome to take our source and make the necessary changes to
2.8.1. We did a lot more than just make gcc generate NT/Alpha executables; a
buncha bugs got fixed while we were in there.)
Jason Zions
Softway Systems Inc.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -