From:	sos AT prospect DOT com DOT ru (Sergey Okhapkin)
Subject:	RE: Time and motion studies of gcc and egcs and LCC
5 Feb 1998 03:56:16 -0800 :
Message-ID:	<01BD3222.BFAC0300.cygnus.gnu-win32@gater.krystalbank.msk.ru>
To:	"gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com" <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>,
	"vischne AT ibm DOT net"
	<vischne AT ibm DOT net>,
	"'marcus AT bighorn DOT dr DOT lucent DOT com'"
	<marcus AT bighorn DOT dr DOT lucent DOT com>

marcus AT bighorn DOT dr DOT lucent DOT com wrote:
> So, I stand by my statement that DLL linkage incurs very little run-time
> overhead.  There is some overhead at load-time, so for a trivial program
> I guess that it could be a significant portion, but for a long running
> program such as bash or gcc, the load-time overhead is proportionally small.
> 

When configure script is running, load-time Dll linkage takes about 70% of total execution time :-(

-- 
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia
Looking for a job.


-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -