Mail Archives: cygwin/1998/01/08/13:16:32
In article <199801080337 DOT DAA55538 AT out4 DOT ibm DOT net>, <vischne AT ibm DOT net> wrote:
>This directory hierarchy is also a useless appendage. It's much simpler
>to set up a Unix file system on your C: drive, and do away with all that
>H-i386-cygwin32 excrement. This is a Unix environment, and all the GNU
>utilities expect Unix directories. So, why use the b18 directory structure,
>that corresponds to nothing in the real world?
I agree with this sentiment. All of the *-i386-* stuff really complicates
things; especially if you are routinely switching between UNIX and NT.
Also, given the necessary amount of translation required for each component
of a path specification in cygwin32, every use of a subdirectory adds
an incremental time cost.
That's why I have my NT system set up to use /bin, /etc, /usr/bin,
/usr/local/bin, etc.
--
http://www.bbc.com/ cgf AT bbc DOT com "Strange how unreal
VMS=>UNIX Solutions Boston Business Computing the real can be."
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -