Mail Archives: cygwin/1997/12/11/04:55:26
Thanks Mumit,
I didn't realize that the c++ option was available. I believe however
that the c++.exe and g++.exe supplied from cygnus are the same file with
different names. I base this on exec "cmp -c /bin/g++.exe /bin/c++.exe"
not returning anything.
- \\||//
---o0O0--Earnie--0O0o----
-earnie_boyd AT hotmail DOT com-
------ooo0O--O0ooo-------
>To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
>Subject: c++ vs g++ [Re: Gcc compiler b18 newbie probs]
>Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 20:19:15 -0600
>From: Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
>
>"Earnie Boyd" <earnie_boyd AT hotmail DOT com> writes:
>>
>> > - use the right compiler driver to compile/link programs. For C
>> programs,
>> > use gcc, for C++ use c++ and for F77 use g77.
>>
>> ^^^ shouldn't this be g++
>>
>
>Historically these two had a subtle difference: g++ implicitly linked
>with libg++ while c++ did not. With egcs-1.00, they're equivalent; even
>before the advent of egcs, I never considereed libg++ as a standard
>package, and preferred not to use g++ as the C++ driver. I guess I
>simply don't like unneeded libraried implicitly linked in that standard
>conforming code(*) does not need.
>
>I haven't checked the last FSF gcc-2.8.0 snapshot to check if the
>distinction is still there or not.
>
>Mumit
>
>* Now we can finally (almost) use the term "standard conforming" when
>talking about C++. What a relief.
>-
>For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message
to
>"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -