Mail Archives: cygwin/1997/12/03/22:27:37
At 11:31 AM 12/3/97 -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
>>I don't see what the fuss is about with spam email and the like. Just set
>>up the appropriate filters to put spam etc into a spam mailbox. Then,
>>quickly scan the contents of this mailbox, read anything that looks
>>interesting and delete the rest. That's what I do. The only problem I see
>>with spam email is wasting Internet bandwidth.
>
>This particular argument crops up every time someone mentions spam.
>What "set up the appropriate filters" means is: Take a stab at filtering
>the spam. Then when something slips through, tinker with the filters
>again. Another one comes through? No problem. Just add another rule
>to the filter. Hmm. How does that work again? man procmailex. Oh yeah.
>
>Not getting any email? Oops. The filter was too general. Someone
>complains that they sent you mail and didn't respond? Oh yeah. I
>haven't checked my spam mailbox in a while.
Interesting; I have 3 mailboxes for my incoming mail - MUST Answer, Should
Answer & May Answer. To date, I have not received any spam sent direct To:
pfife AT cisco DOT com; so, all my spam ends up in May Answer.
>
>I don't care for this scenario. YMMV.
>
>>So, I filter this mailing list to a particular mailbox. I only read it when
>>I want to.
>
>I don't have the option of only reading email when I want to. And, as you
>mentioned, I don't particularly like any of my limited internet bandwidth
>being eaten by junk email.
>
I read my email approx. 6 hours each day. When I read my May Answer
mailbox, I quickly scan it, read what I want and delete the rest. Maybe the
spammers don't mail me direct or something, but all my spam ends up in May
Answer. I rarely read any of it. So, it works for me so far, that's all I
can say.
Peter
>
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -