delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/1997/11/06/14:43:27

From: geklein@[192.168.100.2] (Georg Klein)
Subject: Re: philosophy question
6 Nov 1997 14:43:27 -0800 :
Message-ID: <19971106200925.9056.qmail.cygnus.gnu-win32@koeln3.pop.metronet.de>
Reply-To: geklein AT metronet DOT de
To: raucd AT sk DOT sympatico DOT ca, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

> Date:          Wed, 05 Nov 1997 17:06:42 -0600
> From:          Darren Rauckman <raucd AT sk DOT sympatico DOT ca>
> Reply-to:      raucd AT sk DOT sympatico DOT ca
> To:            gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
> Subject:       Re: philosophy question

> > i don't see a conflict. My goal is simple: to take as much control
> > as possible of NT away from microsoft and into the free software
> > community, so that on those rare cases when I have to use NT, I
> > don't use their miserable tools, their expensive software, or
> > depend on their unreliable SDKs. "Embrace and extend". gnu-win32
> > is a step toward that end. In the limit, we boot an NT kernel and
> > run only gnu tools on top. Now that would be fun.
> 
> That is the best thing I have heard in a long time.  DOWN WITH
> MICROSOFT!!
> 

Hi,

to me, there remains one simple question: why booting an NT-Kernel 
and work with gnu-tools, when you van have that much better: use, for 
example, linux, use FreeBSD and you have alle the gnu-tools you want 
without using a Microsoft OS!

Georg 
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019