From:	garbanzo AT hooked DOT net (Alex)
Subject:	RE: bash performance not so gooood
18 Sep 1997 00:43:45 -0700 :
Message-ID:	<Pine.BSF.3.96.970918002044.916B-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
References:	<01BCC413 DOT 5EC283C0 AT sos>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:

> dahms AT ifk20 DOT mach DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de wrote:
> > 
> > I'd like to know the results for OpenNT 2.0, too.
> > However, OpenNT replaces the MS posix.dll, and so does, I think, UWIN...
> 
> UWIN is not a posix subsystem like OpenNT. UWIN runs on top of Win32 API like cygwin.
> 
> > But without doubt, Linux on the same box would win hands down 8-)
> 
> Shell scripts runs much faster on linux, but cpu eating tasks (like compilation) requires almost the same time.

Actually, no.  FreeBSD seems much faster on two different machines than 95
was at compiling.  Using -pipe on fbsd made things even faster.
 
- alex

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -