From:	fjh AT cs DOT mu DOT OZ DOT AU (Fergus Henderson)
Subject:	Re: Missing virtual functions
2 Sep 1997 01:38:43 -0700 :
Sender:	mail AT cygnus DOT com
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<199709010253.MAA26759.cygnus.gnu-win32@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
References:	<33FF524B DOT 7B256D82 AT uci DOT edu>
Original-To:	ebritten AT uci DOT edu
Original-Cc:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

This is an off-topic answer to an off-topic question about GNU C++.

Eric Britten <ebritten AT uci DOT edu> writes:

>Yesterday I found that if one declares virtual functions in a class
>like:
>
>class A
>{
>    A();
>    virtual void B();
>};
>
>and the definitions for the functions(inline or external) are not found
>by the linker then two types of linking errors result.
>
>1.  Undefined reference to a vtable in the constructors of the class.
>2.  Undefined reference to any other inline functions of the class that
>are used by other code.
>
>It took me a while to figure out that if all virtual functions are
>defined, then these errors go away.  Is this GNU specific?

The exact error messages you get are probably specific to GNU C++.
However, the fact that you do get errors if virtual functions
are not defined is not GNU specific.  The GNU behaviour conforms
to the draft ANSI/ISO C++ standard, which says that programs must
contain a definition of every virtual function.  (Implementations
are not _required_ to diagnose this error, however, so such code
_may_ work on other compilers...)

--
Fergus Henderson <fjh AT cs DOT mu DOT oz DOT au>   |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>   |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh AT 128 DOT 250 DOT 37 DOT 3         |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -