From:	ahc AT lanl DOT gov ("Allen H. Cogbill")
Subject:	How does Cygnus compare to RSX
1 Aug 1997 17:12:32 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<33E25377.5B32.cygnus.gnu-win32@lanl.gov>
Reply-To:	ahc AT lanl DOT gov
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 2.02E (OS/2; I)
Original-To:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-CC:	ahc AT lanl DOT gov
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

I've never used the Cygnus-Win32 development environment, but I
have used RSXNT, which is an extension of the EMX project (for
OS/2) to Win32. How does Cygnus compare? Does it provide the 
same capabilities? RSX seems especially easy to use (to me, at
least), and appears to have few bugs. What isn't available is
a g77 port, whereas I note that is is available under Cygnus.

Any information greatly appreciated.

Allen Cogbill
Los Alamos National Lab
ahc AT lanl DOT gov
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -