From:	youngd AT cirrusnet DOT com (Darren Young)
Subject:	Re: OpenNT & GNU-Win32 Comparison?
22 Jul 1997 08:11:08 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.93.970722092327.30089A-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@downtown>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Sender:	youngd AT downtown
Original-To:	Andreas Bischoff <bischoff AT ise DOT com>
Original-cc:	pyeh AT jungfrau DOT usc DOT edu, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<199707212348.QAA00805@ws4.ise.com>
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

I found this also to be the case. I really didn't want to have to use MSVC
to port code.

============================================================
== Darren Young              == Cirrus Technologies, Inc. ==
== youngd AT cirrusnet DOT com      == info AT cirrusnet DOT net        ==
== www.cirrusnet.com/~youngd == www.cirrusnet.net         ==
============================================================
==            And God said, "Let there be Quake."         ==
============================================================

On Mon, 21 Jul 1997, Andreas Bischoff wrote:

> Hi Peter,
> 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Has anyone done any comparison between OpenNT by Softway and GNU-Win32?  If
> > you know any information or have done a comparison, please let me know the
> > result.  It seems that they are competing products.  Of course, OpenNT is a
> > commercial product which means it costs money.  However, I believe that
> > OpenNT has a better develop environment with a more complete set of tools. 
> > This is what I understand base on the information on the web.  If you know
> > anything more or use it before, please let me know.  Thank you in advance.
> > 
> > --Peter
> > 
> > -
> 
> I didn't do a highly sophisticated comparison, but did check out the
> 30 day demo.
> 
> Turned out that I couldn't do much with it.
> OpenNT requires that you have MSVC installed and does not support C++
> so far. Also, I need Fortran, which is not supported.
> 
> I've tried to compile a couple of standard utilities, started with tcl,
> but the autoconfigure didn't work out.
> 
> Tried also to get gcc/g++ compiled but without much luck, at which point
> I didn't spend any more time with it.
> Also, the bundled X server is the one from Netmanage, which didn't impress me
> either.
> 
> The usage of MSVC creates a mess in my opinion. 
> They tried to create a wrapper, which converts unix like path names to
> windoze like ones. At least in my case this didn't seem to work very well.
> 
> I still think the idea of having a working POSIX subsytem is a good one
> but I'd rather wait for the next release.
> 
> They promised to put tcl/tk and gcc on their web side. Didn't check recently.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 		Andreas
> -
> For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
> "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
> 

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -