From:	jim AT jimpick DOT com (Jim Pick)
Subject:	Re: gnu-win32 licensing terms.
21 Jul 1997 15:08:41 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<199707212045.NAA06139.cygnus.gnu-win32@fleming.jimpick.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/97
Original-To:	spotter AT itd DOT nrl DOT navy DOT mil
Original-Cc:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
In-Reply-To:	Your message of "Thu, 22 May 1997 08:48:47 PDT."
	<33846ADE DOT EA941C35 AT capaccess DOT org>
X-Url:	http://www.jimpick.com/
X-Face:	Hz"C77\53<,u1}C~=DFwS#Ddj161XLl6W!3g7xjxh*P'`FF^-IYQXX$a*WC~=^8rvy"~<3z
	UeQqGo&KZe[}lJg`\+SDMGRVIUJ~P,#(=w~yYv{g9i%"k|\J|jYVvv^Bzfwo=@AddrDMO<xV_IAl`(
	TW7;|vH6Kik(,iljluXex0vrnM: SedI AT lbAeNvM
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

--==_Exmh_-630191900P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Shaya Potter wrote:
> It'd be licensed
> under the Cygnus License or the GPL at the users choice.  Some users
> would be forced to use the GPL, but that would still enable the license
> to be considered "non-discriminatory".

Here's what Cygnus said about putting their code under the GPL in beta 17:

| The Cygwin32 API library found in the winsup subdirectory of the
| source code is now also covered by the GNU GPL.  Since by default all
| executables link against this library, programs compiled by the beta
| 17 tools will also have to be free software distributed under the GPL
| with source code available to all.

Many people familiar with the issues did not agree with the last 
sentence there.  Under some people's interpretations of the GPL (not 
RMS though), if the code is dynamically linked - then the executable
programs don't have to be GPL'd.  It could be argued that cygwin32 is 
providing a standard "POSIX" interface - so they can't prevent people 
from dynamically linking against it.  Remember, Linux is GPL'd, but 
using proprietary applications with it is OK.

(crt0.a gets statically linked - I wonder if using the old one
from Beta 16 would get around the GPL issue?)

Obviously, Cygnus does not agree.  My guess is that because 
this is a fuzzy issue - the GPL is no longer suitable from Cygnus's
perspective.

Cheers,

 - Jim



--==_Exmh_-630191900P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.3a

iQCVAwUBM9PKe+Qz770qyIfJAQFmqwP+PCdLPvCHCQBHKm3vG9KE7gYtg6QKcZaF
CU+huAaSR3NRDf+/dUSqgLVT9EoFRTPN4pucKWeIM9cPnDibdFbz/SAtswEH7/9c
TJVB99iBrfwPWPJOEeDmshlP7L6I7lalE3XVSIn5V7eDy+oWG4SQ6bWwypjJf0Io
mRk8y2YekIk=
=rXSa
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

--==_Exmh_-630191900P--
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -