From:	Paul AT chocolat DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk (Paul Shirley)
Subject:	Re: CygWin32 and djgpp
12 Jul 1997 08:20:13 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<x6OJtNAFZ4xzEwZO.cygnus.gnu-win32@foobar.co.uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Original-To:	Ian MacArthur <Ian_MacArthur AT compuserve DOT com>
Original-Cc:	gnu-win32 <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<199707101602_MC2-1A9D-C3F7@compuserve.com>
X-Mailer:	Turnpike Version 3.03b <XvxOq6RVjuMF4FZcD8CYlzCnSO>
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

In message <199707101602_MC2-1A9D-C3F7 AT compuserve DOT com>, Ian MacArthur
<Ian_MacArthur AT compuserve DOT com> writes
>But I have djgpp v2.01 installed and running quite nicely, so I was
>*concerned* about the possibility of *interactons*, given that both have
>implementations of make, diff, binutils, textutils, sh-utils, etc, and both
>will be on my path (Win95 setup here.)

I have 3 versions of gcc installed (win32,djgpp and ccpsx). I have the
win32 environment set in autoexec.bat, when I need to use djgpp or ccpsx
I run a batch file attached the the dosbox. Prepending the djgpp
directory to my PATH solves the problem.

>Is this OK? Are others doing it? Is one gnu make (3.75) pretty much like
>another (as it were)? i.e. are they compatible, etc. 

I found that the cygnus make will not accept tabless .d files that djgpp
is happy with, its probably advisable not to mix them.

-- 
Paul Shirley
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -