From:	ijurado AT databasedm DOT es ("Ismael Jurado")
Subject:	RE: More relocatable dll woes
11 Jul 1997 19:28:31 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<22455124102803.cygnus.gnu-win32@databasedm.es>
Reply-To:	<ij AT usa DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Original-To:	"Jon Thackray" <jont AT harlequin DOT co DOT uk>
Original-Cc:	<gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Priority:	3
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

----------
> De: Jon Thackray <jont AT harlequin DOT co DOT uk>
> A: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
> Asunto: More relocatable dll woes
> Fecha: jueves 10 de julio de 1997 16:36
> 
> It would appear that the export table of a dll, and the set of defined
> symbols from a .lib file, don't always match up
> ----skipped------

I think you're mixing two different concepts:

     00000000 T _AddAtomA AT 4
 
this is the "mangled" name of the function. The number after the @ is the
number of words of the parameters of the function (or something like this,
I can't remember...) and it is this way because the fuction was compiled as
an __stdcall fucntion whitch also prepends an underscore at the beginning.
This "mangled" name is produced by the compiler to tell the linker that it
is a __stdcall function (as you see in the lib file), but once the code
it`s compiled, the right name ( C functions are not mangled!) is produced
in the DLL or EXE file, that it is what you see here:

    1    0   AddAtomA  (000079CA)

Ismael Jurado
ismaelj AT hotmail DOT com
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -