Mail Archives: cygwin/1997/07/11/12:04:30
On Tue, 8 Jul 1997, Gordon Irlam wrote:
>
> The new licensing terms for Cygwin32 permits anyone to make use of Cygwin32
> without adhering to the GPL, and without being required to make their
> sources available, provided that in so doing they are not attempting to
> directly compete with Cygnus. The reason we decided it was necessary to
> prevent the use of Cygwin32 by companies that are competing directly with
> Cygnus is explained below.
>
> Cygnus specializes in the provision of development tools for embedded
> systems. Cygnus is responsible for perhaps 80% of all on going GCC
> development, and 95% of all GDB development. We commercialize our
> development efforts through our GNUPro compiler tool chain. Other people and
> organizations contribute to, and benefits from our work.
>
Translating into readable English, I read here: "You are not allowed to
create competing development tools based on cygwin32"
How does this affect other GNU compilers, like GNU Pascal and GNU Fortran?
I created and maintain the (cygwin32 based) win32 port of GNU Pascal.
We will surely try to convert the world to Pascal ;-)
Will it violate the new license terms to use cygwin32?
J.J. van der Heijden
---
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going
to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead. -- RFC1925.
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -