From:	bhogan AT bedlam DOT rahul DOT net (Bill Hogan)
Subject:	RE: building lynx2-7-* on gnuwin32
24 Jun 1997 12:42:16 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970624105915.461A-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@bedlam.rahul.net>
Reply-To:	bhogan AT rahul DOT net
Mime-Version:	1.0
Original-To:	"gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com" <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>
Original-cc:	lynx-dev AT sig DOT net
In-Reply-To:	<01BC808F.06DEBAB0@gater.krystalbank.msk.ru>
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:

> Bill Hogan wrote:
> > 
> >   I think it would be preferable to have `make gnuwin32-ncurses' and/or
> > `make gnuwin32-slang' options within the main line of Lynx development if
> > that makes sense technically.
> >   
> 
> With this patch I've compiled Lynx 2.5 and 2.7 as "make generic".
>                   

   "Lynx 2.5 and 2.7" is not well-defined.

   Do you mean, for example,

	http://www.slcc.edu/lynx/fote/lynx2-7-1.zip

and, if so, does your patch apply before or after I have unpacked

	http://www.slcc.edu/lynx/fote/patches/fotemods.zip ?

   (Afaik, "Lynx 2.5" is not being maintained.)

  Cheers.



   


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBM7ANBG1cfyU9ImVRAQEecgP+Lc6bVP96phJwX4xstAylhwWknQdrWIj/
KZi0d0AvCee104PxLwMkon+DsiFiAn0pl+rccwt/ZhEgdPW0oPnFjMR/Fus0kAYv
R31/2E+SFIDkyhtOKswfyURtmR1uvGEaNePHA4xTKDiP9Y7koP0q34jRrTleUCxU
0OUhP8Lc4qg=
=lWV4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -