From:	khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan)
Subject:	Re: G77 and Gnu-win32
1 May 1997 15:23:05 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<9705012016.AA00653.cygnus.gnu-win32@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>
Original-To:	David Coe <david AT coent DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Original-Cc:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
In-Reply-To:	Your message of "Thu, 01 May 1997 06:26:25 BST."
	<33682981 DOT 1AAC3224 AT coent DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

David Coe <david AT coent DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> writes:
> Hi folks!
> 
> I notice that the John Eaton's crew have completed a fair amount of a 
> native Octave port via gnu-win32. I think this must have been via f2c
> for the Fortran bits rather than G77.
> 
> Has anyone though managed to merge the G77 add-on with the Cygnus GCC?
> Alternatively, are there plans for the extensive gnu-win32 changes to
> GCC to be fed back into the GNU distribution?
> 

See http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/software/gnu-win32 for
both g77 0.5.20 binaries/patches and also prebuilt octave 2.0.5. I
wouldn't call octave for gnu-win32 a "port", since all it really
needed was a "configure; make; make install" + workarounds for
gnu-win32 bugs/omissions/misfeatures.

Comes with no support whatsoever.

Unless gnu-win32 gcc backend changes are merged back into FSF, I know
for sure that g77 team would not consider this a viable platform
(unlike EMX and DJGPP). Nobody wants to work on gcc development
snapshots that by definition are unstable and have ever changing
interfaces. 

Regards,
Mumit -- khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu
http://www.xraylith.wisc.edu/~khan/

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -