From:	bhunter AT cat DOT bbsr DOT edu (Bill Hunter)
Subject:	gnu-win32 vs OpenNT 2.0
15 Apr 1997 17:39:39 -0700 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<01BC49C7.956B7BA0.cygnus.gnu-win32@BILLHOME>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Original-To:	"gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com" <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by cygnus.com id OAA01541
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Has anyone compared gnu-win32 to attempted commercial equivalent(s)?  I'm seem to recall that the recently released OpenNT 2.0 - purported to be a *NIX clone that runs under and cooperates with Windows NT - was going to be written with some special blessing (and knowledge transfer) from Microsoft.  Has it benefited from this?  Is it more stable than the admirable-but-still-beta gnu-win32?
 

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -