From:	db AT med-in DOT uni-sb DOT de
Subject:	Differences Win95 / WinNT
19 Mar 1997 00:39:12 -0800 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<199703190611.HAA12511.cygnus.gnu-win32@ukh3029.med-in.uni-sb.de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Envelope:	<gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>
Original-To:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Phone:	(0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3046
Fax:	(0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3369
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Sirs,

we use groff (compiled with b17) on Windows NT and 95 PCs. Under NT
the program could be called groff with some parameters. Groff starts
some other programs (tbl, troff, grops) without problems. 
Under Win 95 all programs have to be called separately with input 
from and output to file.

NT: groff - ..... < filea > fileb

95: tbl < filea > fileb
    troff ... < fileb > filea
    grops < filea > fileb

(under Unix, groff could also be called directly)

What is the reason for this behaviour of Win 95? I need also say
that this sequence is called out of a tcl/Tk-program.

Is there a chance to improve speed with direct call of groff under
Win95?

Thanks

Dieter

-- 
 Dr. med. dipl.-math Dieter Becker           Tel.: (0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3046
 Medizinische Universitaets- und Poliklinik  Fax.: (0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3332
 Innere Medizin III                         
 D - 66421 Homburg / Saar                    Email: db AT med-in DOT uni-sb DOT de


-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -