From:	Paul AT chocolat DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk (Paul Shirley)
Subject:	Re: Cygnus Cygwin32 Press Release 1/21/97
11 Feb 1997 18:57:46 -0800 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<RojfRHAtXOAzEw1i.cygnus.gnu-win32@foobar.co.uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Original-To:	Jim Balter <jqb AT netcom DOT com>
Original-Cc:	Keith Gary Boyce <garp AT opustel DOT com>, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<32FFEEF4.7EC9@netcom.com>
X-Mailer:	Turnpike Version 3.02 <XvxOq6RVjuMF4FZcD8CYlzCnSO>
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

In message <32FFEEF4 DOT 7EC9 AT netcom DOT com>, Jim Balter <jqb AT netcom DOT com>
writes
>Unless Cygnus is going to charge people for wxwindows, it hardly
>seems relevant.  As for patches, what percentage of cygwin.dll
>(remember, *only* cygwin.dll is relevant here; patches to GNU utilities
>or anything else that Cygnus does not have the copyright for are
>irrelevant) is made up of such patches?

If anyone does want to apply the GPL to wxWindows code I will invite
them to remove my patches and contribution. I suspect a lot of the other
contributers will feel the same. I may not have added much but I sure as
hell don't want it to suffer from a *more* restrictive licence than I
intended.

-- 
Paul Shirley
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -