Mail Archives: cygwin/1997/02/08/00:05:01
The cluster size under Win95 is dependent on the size of the partition in
question. I think I have some rough numbers ... nope can't find them.
I don't remember where I've seen them, but it's true. The larger the
partition size, the larger the cluster size. The table is ROUGHLY like
this:
0-200M 4k
201-500M 8k
500-1000M 16k
1000-2000M 32k
Again, these are rough -- from memory not from valid source.
mld
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: du does not find all directories
Author: Sergey Okhapkin <sos AT prospect DOT com DOT ru> at Internet
Date: 2/7/97 5:06 PM
Ken Evans wrote:
>C:\WINDOWS>dir system.bad
>
> Volume in drive C is SEAGATE
> Volume Serial Number is 155D-07CF
> Directory of C:\WINDOWS
>
> SYSTEM BAD 994,684 11-17-96 3:06p SYSTEM.BAD
> 1 file(s) 994,684 bytes
> 0 dir(s) 264,503,296 bytes free
>
> C:\WINDOWS>du system.bad
> 486 system.bad
>
> C:\WINDOWS>ls system.bad
> system.bad
>
> C:\WINDOWS>ls -l system.bad
> -rw-r--r-- 1 500 everyone 994684 Nov 17 15:06 system.bad
>
> C:\WINDOWS>du -sk system.bad
> 486 system.bad
>
> C:\WINDOWS>
>
> And it still doesn't get all the bytes and directories, but it
> looks like 2K is the magic number, -k or not.
It seems to me, 2K is your cluster size. Am I right?
--
Sergey Okhapkin
Moscow, Russia
Looking for a job.
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -