Mail Archives: cygwin/1997/02/07/11:09:03
Shankar Unni wrote:
> Are you sure it's getting to the file OK? The RCS file does get updated
> with the new contents, but the RCS log shows that "+0 -0" lines were
> added, and RCS thinks that the entire new contents were checked in as 1.1,
> with no changes in any of the subsequent versions (which sort of defeats
> the purpose of RCS :-).
>
> Try an "rlog" on your file, and see if you have real (non-0) differences
> between the versions..
Egg on my face. You are correct and I was just a little hasty in my
analysis. I really appreciate your noticing this since I will now
switch back to the ones that came from CVS. Let us all know if you find
a solution.
--
I'm Luke Skywalker; I'm here to rescue you.
/* Jeffery G. Smith, MCSE, smithj AT pobox DOT com *
* BS-RHIT, MS-OSU, DJ-WMHD (aka Doc. Insomnia) *
* Physics Computer Support Team Coach *
* http://pobox.com/~smithj/ */
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -