From:	bms AT earthlink DOT net
Subject:	RE: indent 1.9.1
25 Jan 1997 16:58:36 -0800 :
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<1.5.4.32.19970126001200.006857ac.cygnus.gnu-win32@earthlink.net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Sender:	bms AT earthlink DOT net
X-Mailer:	Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Original-To:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Hi --

At 11:36 PM 1/24/97 EST, dahms AT ifk20 DOT mach DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de wrote:
>Hi, you wrote:
>
>: Problem is that I had an old .indent.pro  that I used on a different system,
>
>Did you check your files for potential text/binary, CR/LF vs. LF problems?
>

Perhaps I shgould make this more clear in the description of the problem...


-bbb is a valid argument and one should simply be able to type "indent -bbb"
and it would not give an error. It can be done with all the other options (I
think all of them) I have tried  it this way and still get the error, so
ther is no cr/lf involved at all.

I looked in the code and ther is a big look-up table and -bbb is in there as
about the 4th option. 

But try as I might , I can see no reason why it doesn't recognise it as
valid. I have even tried the long version --blank-line-after-block-comment
or whatever it is, and it fails that one too.

I hope this helps in the description of the problem... It jsut seems so odd....

Bradley

-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -