Mail Archives: cygwin/1996/12/22/17:36:48
> > > Are any of the compiler tools going to get a GUI? I think it would
> > > be great to simply click option boxs for command line parameters, or
> > > browse for source files.
> >
> > Visual C++ is pretty cheap if you want a GUI. Personally, I don't
> > know why you'd want that - I recently prototyped a project with Visual
> > C++ and then converted it to build under Cygwin32, and breathed a big
> > sigh of relief when I was finally able to type ``make'' instead of
> > having to screw around with the damned GUI (Godawful User Interface).
>
> Yes. That's great idea. And when you are at it, use 'vi', what a GREAT
> editor. And then, what a GREAT relief of not using the GUI debugger!!!
> For instance, instead of just clicking over the name of something to
> be displayed at the screen, type gdb's commands (how easy isn't it?
> Oh! you forgot it, type help !)
Sarcasm aside, I think a GUI is actually a good idea. I'm presently
working in WinNT with an embedded compiler/debugger set (GCC just didn't
have what I needed at the time I needed it), and aside from a slight
lack of features (no ability to make arbitrary function calls, for one)
I found it equally easy to use as gdb.
I still use emacs/make for my editing and compiling environment, but
the GUI for the debugger is definitely superior to the gdb command-line
interface. And the reason is *NOT* because the commands are cryptic
or there's a lot of typing in gdb (I don't like to use the mouse anyway
because it takes longer to move to a menu item and drag than it does to
hit two or three keys); it's because a GUI has a much better ability to
*display* nformation than a single rectangular text screen. The debugger
I'm using does indeed still have a command-line interface, and sometimes
it's necessary to use that; but in those rare cases, I think that simply
adding one or two controls would have solved those problems. And being
GNU software, we'd have that ability.
Now, just because Visual C++ is garbage as a GUI (heck, it's garbage,
period) doesn't mean a good GUI can't be written. In fact, I should
think the person limiting his thinking of how good a GUI could be by
using a Microsoft program as an example should be ashamed of himself
for even considering the comparison!
-- Keith
PS: I happen to like VI as an editor. It does have its limitations,
so more recently I've switched to Emacs in VI mode... now THERE'S a
great editor!
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -