| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | traff AT atomic DOT com (Michael Traffanstead) |
| Subject: | RE: ITIMER Implementation??? |
| 5 Dec 1996 00:39:45 -0800 : | |
| Sender: | daemon AT cygnus DOT com |
| Approved: | cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com |
| Distribution: | cygnus |
| Message-ID: | <3.0b36.32.19961205015125.0090a750.cygnus.gnu-win32@mail.myriad.net> |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Disclaimer: | The sender is solely responsible for the content of this message. |
| X-Sender: | traff AT mail DOT myriad DOT net |
| X-Mailer: | Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0b36 (32) |
| Original-To: | "GNU-Win32" <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com> |
| Original-Sender: | owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com |
At 03:21 PM 12/4/96 -0800, you wrote: >>If they have to re-write they might as well just move to the >>Win32 api. The really interesting task would be to get a >>description of the 'real' NT API, not the Win32 overlay, >>I mean the one that executables flagged as 'NT Native' >>use. I believe that there may be calls in there that >>would enable a much better POSIX emulation (as this is >>the API that the NT POSIX subsystem is based on). What about Win95? Are you planning on having GNU-Win32 behave differently on Win95 and WinNT? Mike Traffanstead - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |