From:	crispen AT hiwaay DOT net (Bob Crispen)
Subject:	Re: FW: Re: wxwin port
12 Nov 1996 18:41:43 -0800 :
Sender:	daemon AT cygnus DOT com
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<32890B13.F42.cygnus.gnu-win32@hiwaay.net>
References:	<1 DOT 5 DOT 4 DOT 16 DOT 19961111125433 DOT 379f9d86 AT dmeasc DOT rc DOT ipt DOT br>
Reply-To:	crispen AT hiwaay DOT net
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
Original-To:	Cesar Scarpini Rabak <csrabak AT dce03 DOT ipt DOT br>
Original-CC:	Fabio Somenzi <fabio AT joplin DOT colorado DOT edu>, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Cesar Scarpini Rabak wrote:

>At 04:19 10/11/96 -0700, Fabio Somenzi wrote:
>>->Does anyone have any input on why 16 bytes from gnu-win32 and
>>->14 for other compiler

>It is not an option for the command line of gcc but rather an extension
>of C language by GNU. Look in the docs for: "__attribute__((packed))"

Now you know why I like Ada: it puts stuff where you tell it.
The first compiler I saw that had the padding problem was the
C compiler that came with SunOS 4.0.3 for the SPARC.  I'm not
sure if there was a way to force "wrong" alignment with that
compiler, but good old Ada did it like a champ.  If you've
ever seen the disassembly of the RISC machine code you get
when you force a load from the "wrong" boundary, it looks
pretty amusing.

Bob Crispen
crispen AT hiwaay DOT net
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -