Mail Archives: cygwin/1996/10/31/23:38:12
I think it would be a great idea as well. Even though we are pretending we
are on Un*x when we are really on NT/95, it doesn't hurt to bring the tools
more inline with the way things are done on Win32 :-) :-)
Phil
"Ook." --The Librarian
----------
Geoffrey Noer wrote:
> >
> > We are thinking about changing the default linker output filename from
> > a.out to aout.exe. Can anyone think of any bad consequences that might
> > result?
> >
> > (My gut feeling is that a.out.exe might be problematic so I lean
towards
> > aout.exe).
> >
> > --
> > Geoffrey Noer
> > noer AT cygnus DOT com
> > -
> > For help on using this list, send a message to
> > "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
>
> It sounds wonderfull to me... only problem that might happen, is if
> some configure scripts rely on the linker compiling to "a.out"... But
> I've never delved into the autoconfigure stuff, and the GNU guys are
> usually smarter than that...
>
> Trevor
> -
> For help on using this list, send a message to
> "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".
- Raw text -