From:	okorf AT netcs DOT com (Oliver Korfmacher)
Subject:	Re: Unix, Win32 & Posix subsystems [was: TeX implementations?]
30 Oct 1996 10:49:28 -0800 :
Sender:	daemon AT cygnus DOT com
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<32773EE6.4E3D.cygnus.gnu-win32@netcs.com>
References:	<199610290633 DOT PAA15705 AT bird DOT fu DOT is DOT saga-u DOT ac DOT jp> <9610291053 DOT ZM27457 AT morgan DOT com> <3276DC93 DOT 4CA6 AT pswtech DOT com>
Reply-To:	okorf AT netcs DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I)
Original-To:	"Mr. X" <andy AT pswtech DOT com>
Original-CC:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Mr. X

> ..
> IMHO, Microsoft designers never really grasped the concepts of
> network transparency and policy-neutrality.  Others have said they
> understood them and rejected them on marketing grounds.  The mish-mosh
> of display primitives and fundamentals such as container objects in
> the MFC is merely an example.  The internals appear to be in very much
> worse shape.

Talking about that, i recall that MS long times ago gave the
sources of NT to universities and schools?! Anybody knows if
this is true? For NT 1.0 or 4.0?

-- 
Gruesse,

        Oliver Korfmacher (okorf AT netcs DOT com, whois OK11
                        URL: http://www.netcs.com/PEOPLE/okorf.html)
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -