From:	randolph AT pcx DOT ncd DOT com ("Randolph Fritz")
Subject:	Threads vs. stdio
17 Oct 1996 15:37:23 -0700 :
Sender:	daemon AT cygnus DOT com
Approved:	cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution:	cygnus
Message-ID:	<9610171204.ZM22261.cygnus.gnu-win32@hood.pcx.ncd.com>
References:	<199610170938 DOT SAA27561 AT bird DOT fu DOT is DOT saga-u DOT ac DOT jp>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	Colin Peters <colin@fu.is.saga-u.ac.jp>
	"Minimalist GNU-Win32" (Oct 17, 6: 38pm)
X-Mailer:	Z-Mail (3.0.1 04apr94)
Original-To:	gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-Sender:	owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Ok, folks!

I'm writing a test program that involves a lot of simultaneous file copies.  My
strategy for this is to create one thread per copy operation.  Will this be
reliable with cygwin?  Will I be able to use the standard i/o libraries from
the sub-threads, as long as I don't do anything silly?


-- 
Randolph Fritz
QA consultant
NCD/PCX division
randolph AT pcx DOT ncd DOT com

-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".

- Raw text -