X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Oa1dsjfY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=5fdfc006 a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=Eez+oi9fExsupS+pffhlhw==:17 a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=zTNgK-yGK50A:10 a=a1KZgU7cAAAA:8 a=Mj1Xp5F7AAAA:8 a=UUWxBs7HlXzlNVcJM98A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ng0hpkU2jXKPaRTLMVYJ:22 a=OCttjWrK5_uSHO_3Hkg-:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1. To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20201219180603 DOT 22277 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> From: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <6984d9ab-3587-f35e-811c-958dc08fdd2c@epilitimus.com> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:19:57 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - delorie.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Authenticated-Sender: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfPeGoznTUSGXM5O7cfrFuegh9AgIs7vU8BkZvX4QN0tQ6pfQi6Tmuqt/uw23Ws4xck1i663Vc6Y7PUi30J9iq6fLM5o+sYA5DzlsQvxjoHrCe7rbklTP SSJTjJ/cxG3KahZTDEYspVom4tasXX5i2p3qz/R+7uBB4ieoC/yUjM9CH7LJPr2MVn7HI0sYp65A7ZMLicMffaRIimlGXemXaII7rVSlMhkt4MCgAZCitl8C Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Roland Lutz wrote: > On Sat, 19 Dec 2020, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> I am willing to write the patch if needed. > > Thank you!  I really appreciate that. :-) > > In this case, I had a specific way of solving this issue in mind which > would not make the (already kind of confusing) code more complicated, > so I patched it myself.  But there is another thing where you could help: > Thank you! > Would you mind finding out versions of the build dependencies are > actually > necessary? > > I don't expect you to hunt down every API change in every tool and > library used (that would be a tremendous effort); simply knowing that > version X.Y compiles successfully and doesn't show any obvious > problems when running would already be very helpful. > For stable-1.10.0 and master pre 1.10.1 update I was building and running successfully with: > guile-2.0 - 2.0.11 > glib-2.0 - 2.46.2 > gio-2.0 - 2.46.2 > gtk+-2.0 - 2.24.30 > gdk-2.0 - 2.24.30 > gdk-pixbuf-2.0 - 2.32.3 > cairo - 1.14.6 > cairo-png - 1.14.6 > cairo-pdf - 1.14.6 > cairo-ps - 1.14.6 > cairo-svg - 1.14.6 > pangocairo - 1.38.1 > pango - 1.38.1 Those are all stock Slackware 14.2 installs. Slackware 14.2 was released 2016-17 (I believe) so that should be a good start. In case anyone else wants to chime in (I don't claim to be a bash scripting expert): > #!/bin/bash > packs="guile-2.0 \ >       glib-2.0 \ >       gio-2.0 \ >       gtk+-2.0 \ >       gdk-2.0 \ >       gdk-pixbuf-2.0 \ >       cairo \ >       cairo-png \ >       cairo-pdf \ >       cairo-ps \ >       cairo-svg \ >       pangocairo \ >       pango" > > for m in $packs; do >  echo $m - `pkg-config --modversion $m` > done If there are any I missed let me know. I will try your fix tonight, changing required version numbers if needed to the above and let you know what happens. As I said previously I really don't have an issue with upgrading guile to 2.2 as the default, as long as 2.0 is still an option. After looking into it I think I understand the rationale and support it. But... On my machine there are several system utilities that use 2.0 which would require rebuilding etc. Pango was the one that opened a can of worms as it had dependencies that affected X and I *really* don't want to have to rebuild X et al. I've done it before, it wasn't fun. Perhaps in the future a simple poll in geda-user of what people are successfully using would be a better approach. Unless you like screaming that is :) And if nobody responds then they have no grounds to complain :P Glenn