X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:18:53 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Lutz To: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20201219180603 DOT 22277 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20201219205836 DOT 23919 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 19 Dec 2020, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > According to the docs on my machine there is no > 'scm_frame_procedure_name' function in 2.0. So if I understand correctly > it is an either/or situation. That's correct. > It should be possible to have configure detect which version of guile is > available and then build accordingly. The reason I don't like that > approach is that if for some reason, e.g. development, you have both > versions available but want to use one of them specifically you can't. Don't give users a way to shoot themselves in the foot unless there is a very good reason to do so. Besides that, Guile 2.0 and 2.2 development files aren't usually installed next to each other (Guile doesn't handle this kind of situation well). I pushed a patch to the branch `stable-1.10' which allows compiling gEDA/gaf with either version of Guile: http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?h=stable-1.10&id=288cb8fd Please use this instead of the provisional patch I posted earlier. Roland