X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] automatically create a .sch file containing a single component? In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Roland Lutz message dated "Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:27:09 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20201209073734.B29CC8512092@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:37:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Roland Lutz: ... > You may also want to have a look at the gEDA XML file format: > > https://hedmen.org/xorn/doc/api/html/geda-xml-format.html I do dislike thoose chatty formats but I can't say that B 0 0 17000 11000 15 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 is much better... (except that it is very simple to write programs for it) Regarding: why not , since x and y is the same thing, just viewed from an different angle (same with witdh and heigth) (and why do you have two "witdh"s in the example ?). Or why not B 0,0 17000,11000 15 0 0 0,-1,-1,0 -1,-1,-1,-1,-1 which would keep related things together and be visually easier to read. Or have named arguments for the lesser used args., like B 0,0 17000,11000 15 0 0 dash=0,-1,-1,0 fill=-1,-1,-1,-1,-1 which could then be simplified to B 0,0 17000,11000 15 0 0 which is a more reasonable size for an argument list. And please choose a format that doesn't need all thoose citations marks and syntactic sugar, which is fine for a parser program but not nice on the fingers. Regards, /Karl Hammar