X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=dpil9Go4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=lurIF75RORk3CC+Wg1aYyQ==:17 a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=afefHYAZSVUA:10 a=rEs-uQuVAAAA:20 a=ZNzOqGV4AAAA:8 a=1t_nUuTBDw24PH-Yx58A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=E-7ZDB97qVM_U7m9UvkO:22 X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=epilitimus.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5agqEChZgAdN9WXiTl8w9aMlonanRy+Rlz2wb7XtCbc=; b=Wnjpv43vr3lahY6eC9G8aH3V8i WqCC3yYPJxMRxrapZguQyhtm3ovWP8/KLbZ/7tKh6WfoxqJG3FZp/F2NLQKB3pp+yWZfaAUuJH8l5 1rwkLle7+HDco9EV6cYNSP03p4mEztx7z26krMHT9cbPMDPQXdx5ra3J6alZ6GmBEuV7q74vXOpu6 +GbNNfmjYyQd0HJUIkph/R1imQjsaolW99BMc1HwxOY1kf+Lcyw5h0MAdvKB9mbIOQ1xAVqGQTrS4 /HfKIGAoEy8BbBL3yPTIb1RhcvqN6f8LlnnLuwUZhaYh+S419e4tYZaLryvYuYQGrbwB5FtorqO0d 0M/HqbdA==; Subject: Re: [geda-user] submitted a new patch To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <14f9e862-8ee0-4432-23b6-06e94215baa4 AT epilitimus DOT com> <32bfe083-3604-b747-030a-48a13e2b1074 AT epilitimus DOT com> <7c133ba2-5b09-91f3-808f-9f444c625278 AT epilitimus DOT com> From: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - delorie.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Authenticated-Sender: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEnfADWQfseFtF2/P4s1rtcdZL5cdeWgTqKFipx9/683JHjvO+5fBtIYpSJMwpWvHnGpLQztEecukSbn46YpbB9Y0b2ZcAwrM+P5jdkO/TUujFL5gXFi XWsleKixAvLne/ejzh3jAb6aFO73sa7AHMjuCgnCuR+Nh4lJkPPC5DhxG7zIobJEySbOtMHyqrh9awQ85PymteM+5zh2vXNHeco= Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk From https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi/blob/master/README.md "The version for /gEDA/ and |gnetlist| is frozen. It is tagged here as /geda-gaf-release-2/." When opening Test.sch from your BBAmp tutorial: > The following options are present in your configuration: > >   traverse-hierarchy (in > /home/glenn/temp/gnet-spice-noqsi-geda-gaf-release-2/tutorial/BBamp/Simulation/geda.conf) > > These options were introduced in gEDA/gaf 1.9.1 as a replacement for > the corresponding gnetlistrc options but were removed again in > gEDA/gaf 1.10.0. The current version of gnetlist uses gnetlistrc > options instead: > >   (hierarchy-traversal "disabled") > > Please make sure to update your configuration as the options currently > set won't have the desired effect. Glenn John Doty wrote: >> >> Any opinions from people who use SPICE? > > From the ngspice manual: > > "you may place a .TITLE  line anywhere in your input deck. > The first line of your input deck will be overridden by the contents > of this line following the .TITLE statement.” > > This means that no special feature is required of a SPICE netlister > here: all the gEDA SPICE netlisters have ways to insert arbitrary > SPICE directives into the deck. I’m not a fan of adding special > features that duplicate general capabilities. > >> What bothers me is the usage of the "comment=" attribute: > > I think that attributes specialized to a particular netlist format > should use names unique to the format going forward. For spice-noqsi, > there are spice-prolog=, spice-epilog= and spice-prototype=. Legacy > attributes like file= are, of course, difficult to replace. > > John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > >