X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=X/4s11be c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=W6v0fqPtKkhodpnY+0Bc8Q==:17
 a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19
 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=afefHYAZSVUA:10 a=P5jw8cGHAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8
 a=Mj1Xp5F7AAAA:8 a=a1KZgU7cAAAA:8 a=RFZ6hgCtxv2r0P64HywA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
 a=7K_5K1MKDTQtdmR-tmmG:22 a=OCttjWrK5_uSHO_3Hkg-:22 a=ng0hpkU2jXKPaRTLMVYJ:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=epilitimus.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
	In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:
	Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
	Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=pVxIMW+wpMn5Cg0X0Vm1CDhygzPApjManZdfsOjKpIQ=; b=XFZB5mcVWMk2GukyHNxKx4YtIi
	FC2A5xuzuTY1HlVJjTI925YPrBZ/Vf2R80jnCONgCOWgI88U/uUUprOSOKWk3HaJf77gGT7DgfnIA
	rZ/O/ZW4Xh4/GQL7eCRZ9qEIHj5mWYZ2osOZHNpYByTc8tCI3OJsUSWG4C2PW0d0nsNeGeGILa5aH
	9OcxfUEgmauahBrSILfcumx9Obd4DYwLHmT3yLom/ZBRNCXy1uoFWbpW5goobYHr/Wh6MhD5KB/x4
	B9kqEM1kzEWsFi1Fd342F7DGL5EfOY2M2DhHOEJcWe49pBe+fh67v5Z3Lc2tWbOSI9ovajBHPyfEc
	0WIhgEeA==;
Subject: Re: [geda-user] A proposal to allow simulation only component to be
 embedded in schematics
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <8e4ea0e5-a35f-59e3-8052-8e5901225461 AT epilitimus DOT com>
 <CACtgWXXv9jkduU4dsZ7yH1QwJ8sQ0BoE5ai_-FAXoNMGUTYeqQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: "Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID: <7894bca2-4b49-8b9c-60cf-babee75952d4@epilitimus.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 09:34:21 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACtgWXXv9jkduU4dsZ7yH1QwJ8sQ0BoE5ai_-FAXoNMGUTYeqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Authenticated-Sender: a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfD4ssW1hP89BGHXF/6LmR1BHxJP0fg88RF+lYcy0XR0EFKb9oZW7sdqcBHW02zhJkRz6gMeU3KTF9trWtpltx5VXx2gQVdcr7iUnSVCfDQyUU+S3Xn7/
 4iuwBjYn9YK15OLO9eY0v2nxMTEB+EbcUZ8UuBRCGjLNvc8M99Uno3rI6fVDhkyho6Immh0eoQ96eWZ3tzwD0NuTzKBPNHZMCcA=
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Not sure since I only have ngspice. But based on this
(https://www.edn.com/use-ltspice-to-simulate-mixed-continuous-and-sampled-systems/)
it looks like they use a similar SOC approach.

I have found the best way for me to learn a new language is to jump in
over my head and start paddling. Works, just makes my head hurt from
banging in the wall. :)

Glenn

M Nelson (drmcnelson AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> How does LTSpice do it?
>
> The proposal sounds like a good argument for a more fundamental redesign.
>
> (Also, not a great candidate for a first experience in python)
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 12:14 AM Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
> <mailto:glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com>) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com
> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com
> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>> wrote:
>
>     All,
>     Find attached a description of what I am considering. If anyone has a
>     better approach, etc. feel free to respond. I know c/c++ but I need to
>     learn a bunch of python before I can start coding much of this so
>     it'll
>     be a bit of a slow start. I am also not sure whether it would be
>     better
>     to send this out as one giant patch or a sequence of patches over
>     time.
>
>     I did look at spice-noqsi but it didn't look to me like it solved the
>     problem.
>
>     Glenn
>