X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=i4CCUsOJksu/SxfIOte8xCZTbz8sdtU9HeWUHClqtow=; b=REYJ2VvwKkx1RRWDE0vT2n+o7B2ZtddpFJLPIl7ND6IfuYImNqfMwUMlhwnRjeQNGh g5sZrpxYME2Pf+gQsWFp7vFjec3WWhsnbgZOQT3PRIyBA2rk3f/S8uYlYwfXO1ER+cJT nemggMbNwRfMRG/QJ+B1ZGN7cwXfynASB2udOg5Sr2bGxXGpEwEhrU9FKHhL1aZBqzbw lu6FznfICh0KsJv/Z+vEQ6fJRtXIPGMMQwoo6h7DjLfQD8gYYf5dcYdeYwMNSyWoTV3k CR6okm0koK94cjqJdBWANXpDS9KxzdPS7vs5aIy50qkEbQF4OkmqjU0xn0YoIAfg4hPL ldBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i4CCUsOJksu/SxfIOte8xCZTbz8sdtU9HeWUHClqtow=; b=uhmhdRWd5QkSXI6xeF5PjVKBOV9sYqyY4QaBpgZJ7FJs9t8R61RHWuXdSDn3FJ13b3 oiCvuZMq78KGbDpOCN1iNLiWelM7EOhTg7+4qieQ3T9qJ70y3oZeVkZx/vnMuHiDBx77 x/CV3XVkqkvDyBGdHaAvGKwNznbqcv4OeRS/bQFiIGdqabyUT2Tn1brfbYgGguOKIpR9 TdibJ0XhQ/DSTHL1+tH1puU2NBRTyL/90DgNu6O1iuZZc7FJFFs0wMPhlOOMndQJUFHO SA/0lvtAohZY+0o0gWjZqVvgn6L0g4ayJO63SbAJ3fc9Mx64mJJ3c3tiN2Bk4XcBqGo3 M64A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWoqh3IjDQJv9CzADQPwQsbN40WFFZu0ZV8U1v8eh7HQ3rDT6mr BdSSxEsonPL0dH+82166OHIob0nf X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy3gEuerlZ6LZzPR8ph7xL/MeWVrKf083Lr7n6nV3je0IdDyRlHUE/SAkS9w6GAVZ6xcmOp5w== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:884f:: with SMTP id z15mr17297124ljj.46.1582146030865; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:00:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:00:29 +0100 From: "N (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Proposal: Library handling Message-Id: <20200219220029.125afb8941f9ea3303eb9f93@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > The thing that this proposal doesn’t address is that neither external library symbols nor embedded symbols are ideal for an evolving project. > > External library symbols are good starting points, but need customization (mostly attribute additions and changes, but sometimes more) to be usable. > > Embedded symbols are inflexible. If reference is available they could be updated then neeeded. > What works for me is to copy a library symbol, give it a name like “bypass_cap” or “low_speed_opamp” that reflects its role in the project, and place it in the project’s symbol directory. Then, instead of adding attributes to each instance, I put them in the symbol file. This makes it easy to control BOM complexity: if I want to change my bypass caps from 0603 to 0805, I do it in one place. I isolates the project from library changes without the inflexibility of embedded symbols. It solves the “light vs. heavy” symbol dilemma: you don’t need a library containing a billion heavy symbols, but your project reaps the benefits of the heavy symbols it needs. Then you could have a local project specific library of symbols. Have seen an example a few weeks ago there someone added an attribute to reference part and it might solve the light/heavy symbol problem. It would be possible to add feature with a list of value for attribute values referencing part is filtered depending on attribute values.