X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:42:40 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] [patch] Pinnumbers in mosfet-with-diode-1.sym In-Reply-To: <20130131100136.GP32216@fi.muni.cz> Message-ID: References: <20130130090351 DOT GE32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1359555319 DOT 2295 DOT 9 DOT camel AT AMD64X2> <20130131100136 DOT GP32216 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 31 Jan 2013, Jan Kasprzak wrote: > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > : > : > : On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Stefan Salewski wrote: > : > : >This is something what confused me too when I used gEDA/PCB for the > : >first time, but there exist no easy solution. You should find > : >discussions of this problem in in the wike and in this mailing list, or > : >maybe on in older initial gEDA mailing list. DJ and others have mode > : >suggestions to solve such kind of problems, some suggestions use a > : >database to solve it. > : > : > : The solution I found easy is my devmap script: I can use the generic > : symbols with letters, then I attach a devmap attribute telling which > : actual device and footprint shall be used (e.g. bc817_sot23) and the > : rest is done while converting from gschem to pcb. Actual device maps > : are plain text files that describe attributes to be > : added/overwritten with a pinmap functionality that can replace pin > : numbers by value (so that pin C becomes pin 3). Device maps are easy > : to write, easy to maintain and VCS friendly. Schematics with the > : above "bc817_sot23" next to the symbol are readable, still not > : overtaxed with extra text. > > Interesting. It seems that devmap is not (yet?) packaged for > Fedora. I will have a look at it. > I've packaging scripts for deb, but not for rpm yet. The infrastructure at repo.hu is capable of building rpms once the spec file and stuff are in place in the repository. If you have a Fedora and find the tool useful, a contribution of rpm packaging files is welcome! Regards, Tibor