X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=oDjCJvfp7AUIoe8h3sc1I26NECuTp3o1G14ZYaAgWHw=;
        b=C0SFYDVb/t5Vps3rFrIwrLDqjm3opMBgFc/4weiPCqlaIjJBfSMaMo3AixlJhdWKeG
         XF5Ly/vItOpRziXsLogsQwjqbiowDoX5Xa9rPIi4q/0Z/TgY7CQ6MHHOAmzLV5qHNCv0
         Pg/bcaq5dIcdpTCMOYddi3rsfcadYWZ2HM65zbLtC86f3EZwKNoLXbX17nh+e7Kf+ygw
         yWWnNIUXfPqzwgpP/oYIXJFZvGvvzPK8Z6VRyJob4yaRhaiaglSIzPbwNjpGxt39YbFF
         SBPxEV3/CYq6kwMLYe7G7bHBfySSIloB3bv0hE+b31ecwN5xovmZvDYWoP93Xmp7EPz3
         nqBA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.179.66 with SMTP id bp2mr1375058qcb.124.1359117600769;
 Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:40:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <kdtmo7$4s5$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <8738y3iigd DOT fsf AT dome DOT home>
	<kd22k1$vna$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<kd4557$3gn$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<201301151848 DOT r0FIm62T000949 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20130115191524 DOT 11400 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<201301151927 DOT r0FJRdxV003764 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<87mwwaqjs7 DOT fsf AT dome DOT home>
	<87y5fs10o6 DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
	<201301180857 DOT r0I8vjTw025696 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<kdc2jk$nd4$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAPYb0EGW1MfeNiE39-Y02UrJTVwVWXjvPiU=geRqKaBe7yU5Wg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<kdtmo7$4s5$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:40:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOuGh8-ZCMz2p5jTJeUzqNJNm2EapOqVV27ah5C41yhzKQBOUw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Any new geda port for Windows?
From: Bob Paddock <graceindustries AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> It looks like the code that interpretes the config file replaces "/"
> by "//".

I wonder what system requires "//"?  Seems like an error in itself.