X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <20130115053539.10546.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:35:39 +0100 From: Peter Stuge To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Data model [was: geda-skeleton-project: Lowering the cost of a starting a gEDA project] Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <87wqvhd4tw DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <20130115013756 DOT 9917 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <50F4E4D1 DOT 3010802 AT ecosensory DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50F4E4D1.3010802@ecosensory.com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Griessen wrote: > what about keeping a snapshot of the symbols and footprints as they > were the day that project completed a version and made fab data? The data model is important. Let's back up a bit. What are the pros and cons of having a single IP library vs. having different ones? (Both version controlled of course.) Are there any use cases for different (local) IP libraries? I can't think of any. //Peter