X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=NJxXCjGg c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=F7YQP-1FNzsA:10 a=qwaEpgMPffwA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=DBD04xgeLIwKpUxnlW8A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 70.113.67.117
Message-ID: <4ECA9BF9.9000601@ecosensory.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:44:09 -0600
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111010 Icedove/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Modern GAL/PAL design with gEDA?
References: <20111117204524 DOT 10e586f5 AT rainbird>	<4EC5CBEE DOT 5060904 AT optonline DOT net>	<CAN0Jx-84K3n+g+ZH29wjzkuusBa=Bk_F=SaY+Z=fdm-JTf=HKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20111120162218 DOT 555bc069 AT rainbird>
In-Reply-To: <20111120162218.555bc069@rainbird>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 11/20/2011 03:22 PM, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
>   Doesn't seem as cryptic as I expected, though I can't help but wish this whole process were simpler.

Think of the convenience of verilog being about
assignments that happen in parallel, and you'll be way ahead.
It is the exception to be procedural, executing a line at a time
in verilog, not the rule.

John