X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=rFxaVhpzdNKRsWyFDFmDbYx/QEtlW7L1Gw9MiLxO4aw= c=1 sm=0 a=F7YQP-1FNzsA:10 a=hp8O-sM8_ncA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=u53stecuSJwucPwe+xKvUw==:17 a=bcqsdNPOpBXMWdGDED8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=u53stecuSJwucPwe+xKvUw==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 70.113.89.74
Message-ID: <4EAABF94.1010506@ecosensory.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:43:32 -0500
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111010 Icedove/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Working with a 0.1mm grid
References: <CAKakQccTk7cNBhDt4SM=jq5hrEBzWC8er53JSSNsch5+-7pCWw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <201110201548 DOT p9KFma9K019672 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>	 <20111020172714 DOT GB20384 AT malakian DOT lan>	 <CAKakQccb967HgSod6BeULhCSj7gE+L0oAVb=L82pGcOphJ7ohw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <20111021013756 DOT GE20384 AT malakian DOT lan>	 <CAKakQceJ8GBzX+jHqrhpD2D+-f1eoMqb7h5igJhHe-DuwQB1aQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	 <20111021025514 DOT GF20384 AT malakian DOT lan> <1319310645 DOT 13417 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1319310645.13417.8.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 10/22/2011 02:10 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> I personally think that we're at a point where we should move on and
> just save such files.
+1

The footprints -- would those stay backwards compatible?

John