X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=6iUZnR/JDQfh1s2yPwdbBArkpAtlhzKYMi9LqeZTI8A=;
        b=P+RPkv0xL14hqZaLU/hjvyKyFOKad7EjWGS95Aas60PoANIF0BBhmj9wrQThWpG+YT
         KoTHdsLOifKjQb2px4XYd85mxTtm4mGGwG9LhaT97mGLopZb9+2rEJBDmLGDV9MlN5Lo
         Hh7qvVw6KErxBymrHjZ5MFqVLopmDv50Jwx3Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: and DOT damore AT gmail DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Prayer.1.3.4.1110012334370.9767@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <9BA5588F-2354-41EC-9B67-740D896945DA AT comcast DOT net>
	<CAMonFrRVL2KmKGgt90a9EuDqwHKUCa+GAGU_=yQxMFoPEodfnQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<Prayer DOT 1 DOT 3 DOT 4 DOT 1110012334370 DOT 9767 AT hermes-2 DOT csi DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:52:26 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: w1We16nGBxPNweM6pLhzbiXYPZo
Message-ID: <CAMonFrSSnMa060aQCiu4N4doMUmRogCdz7kkRxvuDn7Lp0mAww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Building PCB with Mac OS X 10.6.8
From: "Andrea D'Amore" <and DOT damore AT macports DOT org>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 00:34, Peter C.J. Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
> I would expect that the purpose of moving the predicate computation to
> runtime (rather than at build time) lets us cross-compile for other target
> architectures (e.g. Win32), without having to know what the results will be
> on that architecture at build time.

Will this change make it into gst repository? This would make thing
easier from a packagin perspective.

> But we shouldn't be conflicting with a system install libgts. (I guess we
> probably _are_ conflicting from what you said), but we should get away with
> just statically linking our local copy of that library.

Conflicting at a file level, the install target tries to copy builtin
libgts.* files that are already being provided by gts.


-- 
Andrea