X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: geda
From: karl AT aspodata DOT se
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] route style, line distance
In-reply-to: <CAJZxidBx-gRWebPy_vHMwJRDgLqzpUeh5E4_YL=oWVX-2Cs0Cg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190308220352 DOT B506685E7F7D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <CAJZxidBx-gRWebPy_vHMwJRDgLqzpUeh5E4_YL=oWVX-2Cs0Cg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Chad Parker (parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
   message dated "Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:02:35 -0500."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <20190315142629.165AA85E7F6B@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:26:29 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Chad Parker:
> Presently, the clearance parameter of the route style is only respected by
> polygons (I think). The "online" DRC isn't (yet) sophisticated enough to
> respect anything other than the global DRC requirement.
> 
> My suggestion for a work around at the moment is to use a grid setting that
> places the traces at the desired spacing.
> 
> Having a per-net or a per-netclass DRC, both online and off, is on the todo
> list. You're not the only person to desire this feature. I have to put some
> infrastructure in place to support it. I've been working on it, but
> progress is slow.

I there anything I can do to help with that ?

There is src/drc and I see there are some commits and branches about drc
but I don't know where to start and how to connect that to routing 
styles.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar