X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:08:42 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb-rnd says good bye to gEDA (part 3) In-Reply-To: <20171211175950.GM4167@stuge.se> Message-ID: References: <20171211175950 DOT GM4167 AT stuge DOT se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >> (part 1 was the 66.667% announcement; part 2 was the rationale of the >> split; now about the future) > > The progress of pcb-rnd is super cool! > > Although I haven't yet tried pcb-rnd I have always enjoyed reading > about pcb-rnd changes and development. > > I recognize that what started as a fork of gEDA pcb has grown into a > whole family of tools with increasing quality and opportunity, and I > understand and support the decision to "move out of the parents' house"! :) > > Nevertheless, I consider pcb-rnd super relevant to gEDA and all gEDA users. Thank you! > >> Since the emperor of gEDA is DJ > > Mh. I don't see him that way. I think (hope) he doesn't either. It was a reference to a semi-serious signature of a previous mail, sort of an insider joke: http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=geda-user/2017/02/19/14:07:34 Regards, Igor2