X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=m0n5t3r.info; s=m0n5t3r; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=DG8F7nUQdWzGSpxvmSVMRn8f8oqNZtCFw/IFvfu8kvE=; b=LBkjGdH+wcp+7o/d4af3+4UnKPSYmUWyJlUj+BOSwatMgIsU3n+uchlnzME2yQHoMO 2U6PcIrLvaiNQlEpK8LfGwXVI5uKS1MQ2bMhWGxwKfi759xM9SQz7I+2uNjDpqu2+aTC uMCec8iiUojRMxXxAe1hIPP3n9cuGgLQx88tE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=DG8F7nUQdWzGSpxvmSVMRn8f8oqNZtCFw/IFvfu8kvE=; b=ahcWnFF6Nlnqk6KyDuZ6CKn19i+G8aKDql1y7Gtsu19/z6jadZMyYj/u7symNt05QX 8bwIvCed8gTcHhYnvs2+49F4ROEpng1OTLkvRfEMkOowDfBerAB64nN3/xII+enGgEgl HQdpGJ2UBGpsYaRIKXyFhXQGe6usBR+ltNXGX0TbCpKvqpQh5YThiG7wcnyuwHDXuyVc au2XwpHDrdnR+E0htjxu24kGYMTuOVrELvzc3aQPN3Vtu7VUeUcDoDcEI4VjtjuFKnVU /dbrPEko6K58apFmdDWU8dzvGIbhn4pfYwofrMZY1miWHmWyfYwsmsMlel+ZRgNiL5OV 9g7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m+SQw3fm30QKcdTh7ssxAb8fBf5o6Ue7EjoaJ0kCCQpns9vnAj+QSJ4Wwd3L+aZA== X-Received: by 10.223.178.87 with SMTP id y23mr30020032wra.91.1487204574874; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:22:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [geda-user] RFC feedback on release pcb-4.0.0 requested To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl> From: "Sabin Iacob (iacobs AT m0n5t3r DOT info) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <090d1af2-dd7f-a2bd-4ef6-689c017ed189@m0n5t3r.info> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:22:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58A4AFF5.3040008@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jwFqvUBvhP0iE2Dhk9NUqj4cMmxnklL1t" Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jwFqvUBvhP0iE2Dhk9NUqj4cMmxnklL1t Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="kg3C0791UOasBOBaQT0ehrxIb5UnfpO3M"; protected-headers="v1" From: Sabin Iacob To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <090d1af2-dd7f-a2bd-4ef6-689c017ed189 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> Subject: Re: [geda-user] RFC feedback on release pcb-4.0.0 requested References: <58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl> In-Reply-To: <58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl> --kg3C0791UOasBOBaQT0ehrxIb5UnfpO3M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/15/2017 08:45 PM, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Hello list members, > > It has been almost a month to this day that a new release of pcb was > done. > > In this month there have been some 709 downloads of the tarball. > > What we active developers would like to have feedback on is: > > 1) how many list members have downloaded the tarball ? > > (0 or +1 suffices) if "tarball" includes https://launchpad.net/~mehanik/+archive/ubuntu/geda-unstable, then +1 > > 2) how many list members have tried to build an run the new version of > pcb ? > > (0 or +1 suffices) no build, but ran the PPA version; +0,5, I guess? > > 3) what was your user experience ? (what went good, what went bad, > what was the first impression after test driving, etc.). > > (you can put the whole rant here ;-) I just loaded a few existing designs and they seemed fine, I had no time to do something new... looks and feels like good ole PCB to me :) > > > > If you didn't download the tarball you can do that from: > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/pcb/pcb-4.0.0/ > > > We hope to here from you soon ;-) > > Thanks in advance and with kind regards, > > Bert Timmerman > > --kg3C0791UOasBOBaQT0ehrxIb5UnfpO3M-- --jwFqvUBvhP0iE2Dhk9NUqj4cMmxnklL1t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYpPDcAAoJEIIekQf3ltoLyWoQAIkTPiGPsdTOr+/v9vvmW1pR qetZkDVCq/836eJgoaILO72BfrNh6MumGodk5KL4fWAmRAkdDYSyaM6loF0bnFds IvMeYwYoanwsBKJ6Xr8Srst07JumlJTG01Oa2OEaEH4G0mcu6mog9LwGg1wZXAwH Qodx3eKLwPlNTmXuIx4pb8YKaXh7ylCckol6NlSsjkWV5bKPqfbEjOr653R8LXg2 Xn0N4DzshY7ezKk18wUOURKo8CBgajLLs2/e6JNQ5co5UdWRuWuhXvK5AVTtvVcA Cify/z/SvWxoLOUJRxO/Ueg0GBy+KebtXOybKVDMcmHgj62O6ZoSBw30yc3T5G/d sk7kc8SASdbxwUAsgUDkucL1OmdACqL+cNtFRabxYdJ9xSgF0xooGGcN0Ds5WqnH BDAU7QSwdXF9eVcdsuu72qnfQ9Q+l9vOEE4atw2WlFhDuFyg9tSTJKTnDcf7BVGc QHA98/dyGWPKV0bJ/ml3D48S8NRDFf/MwQMxSKAVzA7LGIOz52HcSJnYjutASg8F BR0RIQJsllsKlNC3h8ND4G8y+bnBmQ6QLurTkW0byf7ohXb7Y101vP2G/VqtXs5P wiJuTRvPs6tn+INgVsKTWzXpGdNiFo5a4k/cqoApmoaqBT9LVqz3yOLLHLaOL8zI R+Ih6gSCpn2J4nATZT0M =Iyk7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jwFqvUBvhP0iE2Dhk9NUqj4cMmxnklL1t--