X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EjIfiSlo9fjGGCDsHgDXTsLIGIy0FWHV6ArD1cDecq4=; b=hBGVNGtXM4mVKz9pEBClAgl5+mjZMPuE8eP85Uzv4dOdoEYOSATuJRXWIwkHAXoBoJ xovk/cb8JDC8/g8onw2TUI+rATmeHE71xbhziAcCxvG1eHp6RCQ7XutcbrD9Hkd4xbYe ltxw+ujpjnNT6R92zWHHODArYU6ML0V3lNNBZyOwNOICbsicKzPLQP7A5zXywkeC3I9E m7BN1712wNJPGEdezaQAyrWO99upR6ULVug7WyY+vSDPwU2VgLWBU6vId7war1WHeljT v3PyMMRfjFqBa0BtWhSQtXtA/8tr7dhAbfDim33EAatd02Ms2Q39I2gYoc/qz7T6fXqz pLYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EjIfiSlo9fjGGCDsHgDXTsLIGIy0FWHV6ArD1cDecq4=; b=oSZ8+6/5I/7jeq51+gygIGGZKQeyzSrCPXA+q1+rJlF2pZwXTpp9r53rxO0mSB1HhE 4mp4uAHPp73KrYGVi7rvpm8SRq7QWJzDbuyt9ow151712/DSB66ghLskyUrvw6KJtKR7 7isllvO4Hv1t1GltRDX5EKNPPkyATkbSRQnUELjA4VvA9iz2TpLM6zGdXUGPhfEPFC92 T1H2oJzcvWbsGltwLDLK6kNkyKZdmuJ8fsyWSWZm+bgvqDjD58jkZuxNlzJhaP/C+JY5 UMgC0Q4kUnbeI66c3WtsIqHprpntgJ4yc4xQl/PQIyUwDKa6CBTtGd+opsHP9MR2D3W5 VPhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKXml/B31Np7531AouXsN3CWScDBMf3IBadLVOUf4u7+cG6Lk1gpRhUDqo8VA8mlb8dSy5MEkC+io8npQ== X-Received: by 10.55.17.223 with SMTP id 92mr80562341qkr.30.1483860716157; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:31:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 22:31:55 -0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb-rnd] in Debian testing - why no emphasis on fork To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:32 PM, wrote: > Hello Sergey, > > On Sat, 7 Jan 2017, Sergey Alyoshin (alyoshin DOT s AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> Hello Igor, >> >> On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:31 AM, wrote: >>> >>> pcb-rnd 1.1.4 succesfully migrated to Debian testing (a.k.a. Stretch) >>> recently. This means Debian users with anything more recent than current >>> standle (Jessie) should be able to install pcb-rnd from the official >>> repo. >> >> >> Description of pcb-rnd package does not mention relationship with pcb >> package, is it intentional? > > > pcb-rnd has added a great amount of complex, large features last year. We > also started to have our own file format. We are compatible with pcb, but we > are also compatible with kicad - there's no conceptual difference in how we > load/save a .pcb file or .kicad_pcb file. The relation of pcb-rnd to pcb is > going to be more and more similar to the relation between pcb-rnd and kicad > or other packages. From an user's perspective this means pcb-rnd is not a > geda/PCB with slightly different config and 2..3 minor improvements (like it > was in 2013), but it's more of a totally different layout package. Sure, but out of courtesy - the same sort of courtesy the people who run this list have extended to you in allowing you to use it as you have - you should still mention pcb. It's also more honest to users. The fact that a piece of software has recently experienced a significant fork is an important, both of the fact that there's still interest, and of the nature and state of the community. Any new pcb release should likewise mention pcb-rnd. Britton