X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 05:11:02 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb mingw cross build
In-Reply-To: <0e1ab4b7-8d5e-ff69-3da6-a33d8dd08737@mcmahill.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1701050510080.7286@igor2priv>
References: <99e05dd6-94e6-a695-5498-2e3f837b5bc8 AT mcmahill DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1701050405370 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <0e1ab4b7-8d5e-ff69-3da6-a33d8dd08737 AT mcmahill DOT net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> On 1/4/2017 10:09 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Dan McMahill (dan AT mcmahill DOT net) [via
>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> 
>>> Has anyone run the minpack cross build of pcb for mingw lately?
>>> 
>>> Has it ever fully worked?
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to decide if I can easily repair something which worked
>>> previously and doesn't now or if it ever worked.  I'm also hoping to
>>> bring back the installer which went away when the cross build
>>> framework replaced the cygwin build stuff.
>>> 
>> 
>> A few days ago I used it with pcb-rnd. It didn't work out-of-the-box,
>> had to use newer version of some libs so the old patches failed to apply
>> and some of the lib test code fail to compile, had to disable them. So
>> with some manual tweaking I could get it to work.
>> 
>
> Thanks, this is encouraging.  Any tricks on getting gettext to build? That one 
> seems like a mess and is my current failing point.

gettext-0.17-1 worked here.