X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net Subject: Re: [geda-user] Project leadership (design error in the core of gschem) To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <43CC8F96-6452-40FA-9DFB-E0983721C19C AT noqsi DOT com> <20151229094603 DOT 782092b57563336883546bfd AT gmail DOT com> From: John Griessen Message-ID: <5682D724.1010705@ecosensory.com> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 12:55:32 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 12/29/2015 11:29 AM, Ozzy Lash (ozzy DOT lash AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > In places were slotting could be cool we don't use it right in the > standard symbol library. Take the symbols for the larger xilinx chips. Slotting is intended for chip ins and outs that cannot change, so FPGAs are not a good example. FPGAs are very regprogrammable as far as which pin/pad/ball does a particular internal function. They don't need slots -- at least not classical slots. What would be good for FPGAs is a quick/easy way to change pin numbers of a symbol, and simultaneously update the netlist to match that same function without having to undo gschem nets that are already connected to that place. (A place that just got a pin swap or several done on it)