X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=uQgviuvzQL7q6C1loqoFmCJ/P6rI1T0e35BwHWXD3e0=;
        b=VCQw9UgMxQHjNQt251YjMjXNHDV7JUSPn1VAT5BCTJuoDPRkbaBxqMeU9VFrUeRa8m
         vCBMOwplsPUjf3DDw/fW45pgn2kpSsf7JhwXHoeNxeHrC0I2RLPTBjlf2MpGXiorgdnV
         JGvNsaNoFGf+oG1Omp6VNNwukJVt0bjpixjYmW4LvPyjt89bgTx8GKvYSYU307QfP1yP
         yGkAPJvItqlii9ndECC6rQJWZG9AaCWzP2rr/c8dD1YwrLY0MRwuFuFPDZntibGSXwBK
         QneKz6pRX5RWiXg5/2Q8wlgjtldtvI9o3VwcLFMwmFm1siyOZH+5A1HtesRx2HpEGrCK
         Qgpw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.20.24 with SMTP id k24mr10178646lfi.117.1445790467772;
 Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201510250631.t9P6Vp0e024642@envy.delorie.com>
References: <CAM2RGhQhNkShqtN8uyCSd7R+V4FgLXDZTvTC2RTdmKF7C_8ndA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQOpnBXbZXngNq=RcQTZN=UrU+PGzTZ9AC=xKNfu_zQkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510220149 DOT t9M1nrIe016145 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQ26+gpcAeTdgJpBEh0egOGLYcpizQ+B6kfTQLowEk5xQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151022023002 DOT GA25952 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
	<CAM2RGhQ7xfMDe1knmiFkW8MAZ4Sr=ZSas8Ca9Sadv3gJT2z3gw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510221643 DOT t9MGhFfg003310 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20151022170259 DOT GA28154 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
	<CAC4O8c-AGwV59t6-K+73eaZt0d43bJe0kE8E68n9pWxaa9gP+Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151024050756 DOT GA5741 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
	<201510240528 DOT t9O5S5qc019927 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTh0zk0JNhq00D0aRbaY9_a7ZBAAo_n=igOt13E4D5-0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510250424 DOT t9P4O0ZB017263 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhScar6LDyzsCtne+xpA--A0NE_bfUKas=XMBaqaUvfkwQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201510250631 DOT t9P6Vp0e024642 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:27:47 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhQzShcfsKyDEhw_0pJRn+9dFa7xaJaEaCHAnjBuNBG56w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Star shorts
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:31 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> > It occurs to me that we could, perhaps just for testing, use the net
>> > *name* to flag its functionality.  For example:
>>
>> What if you have more than one bus?
>
> "Perhaps just for testing"

For testing what? gschem? pcb? gnetlist?
I mean the next thing I see happening is a bunch of people adopting
this and causing us to have yet another workflow to support.

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/